so if someone sends you a COPY of their picture and gives you permission to use it on your site, and then they use their own picture somewhere else, they didn't copy it from your site. Sounds to me like y'all have really set yourselves up to lose participation.
And I see by some posts above...
LOL I'm sure most breeders do exactly this, but since you've taken pics of chickens you certainly understand getting that 'perfect' shot isn't an easy thing with a critter who doesn't understand "turn your head just a little to the right"
Sounds to me honestly, like the 'club' is setting...
who is Justin? certainly not me............you have me confused with someone else. the 'Chaz" part of my name there should be a clue, just like if you click my user name and view my profile it clearly says my name is Charles.......and of course, you don't have my permission to use my name in...
well if a woman was born with a man's dna, wouldn't that make her a man? LMAO I thought the article pretty much clarified that these woman shouldn't have male DNA in them, so they had to get it somewhere......
anyway, I just found the article interesting. I never said I took it as gospel so to...
well ok, but, if it wasn't 'transmitted' from him to her, then how did it get into her body?
I do agree though it doesn't say anything about her being able to transmit it forward. I still found it to be an interesting article. Good discussion y'all, thanks for that
oh I agree with that, i think the thought was it could pass into future generations. I'm definitely uneducated when it comes to all that 'this gene mixed with that gene produces _______' but I can see where that Cancer Center article could lead someone to think it's possible in mammals that...
Believe it or not, I was told the same exact thing by a dog breeder when I were talking to a couple of them about maybe breeding cocker spaniels from our female. She'd come in heat and been bred by a neighbors lab before I realized it, and when I said something about it to the breeder who was...
ok I agree with that. That's what I was asking, I promise I wasn't asking if that rooster was always and forever gonna be that hens baby daddy..........
click the first sentence in that paragraph that refers to the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center and their study. that's where this came from.
So basically they are saying that a woman can have male DNA once she's given birth to a son, or even if she was pregnant with a son and lost or...
LOL
um, no that's not what I was asking at all. I do know semen only lives a short time, and no I wasn't asking if her chicks would always be that roosters offspring, I do know a little more maybe than some of y'all give me credit for.....
I really need to go find that article and post it...
wouldn't this hold over in the females once they're bred? I've read recently that a scientific study was done that showed a female (all species) retains some DNA of the male forever once they've received his semen into their body. Yes, this even included women.....that's a scary thought indeed...
I've gone out and spent a few minutes looking at them all again, the other hens don't have any where near the comb the boys do, including this one. Like I said, I've said for the last few weeks I had 4 and 4, it just struck me this morning when I took them their daily watermelon rinds that this...
well I could be wrong, but hey I have been before. Not exactly sure about when they started developing their combs, although I've been told not to put a lot of stock in the comb. But all the 15 week olds started about the same time, some are just bigger and more pink than others. I guess I'll go...
gonna post up some pics, if y'all don't mind. I know the 'hen or rooster' has to get tiresome, LOL but I have one I thought was a rooster, now I'm not so sure. I'll post three pics of it, then pics of the 3 I know are roosters that are the same age. I'm going strictly on the tails, at this age...