This on today's BBC website: Vets say they are under pressure to bring in more money per pet
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c62zzegvk33o
Some highlights: "In 2013, only 10% of vet practices in the UK were owned by large corporate groups. Now that figure stands at 60%.
Bills for pet owners have risen as corporate ownership has increased - by more than 60% between 2015 and 2023, figures from the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) show. This is almost double the rate of inflation or the increase in vet salaries over that time....
A survey of 275 veterinary staff, carried out by the British Veterinary Union (BVU) for the CMA last year, and now shared exclusively with File on 4 Investigates, indicated that monitoring and targets had an impact on the decisions of almost 40% of nurses and just over 17% of vets.
The BVU says the sector has become more profit-driven since non-vets were allowed to take over practices in 1999."
The unnecessary prophylactic dispensing of wormers and flea treatments for the profit of these companies (and at the cost of significant harm of wildlife) is a facet of this exploitation of pet owners and their animals. See e.g.
https://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/243875/toxic-flea-tick-treatments-polluting-uk/
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c62zzegvk33o
Some highlights: "In 2013, only 10% of vet practices in the UK were owned by large corporate groups. Now that figure stands at 60%.
Bills for pet owners have risen as corporate ownership has increased - by more than 60% between 2015 and 2023, figures from the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) show. This is almost double the rate of inflation or the increase in vet salaries over that time....
A survey of 275 veterinary staff, carried out by the British Veterinary Union (BVU) for the CMA last year, and now shared exclusively with File on 4 Investigates, indicated that monitoring and targets had an impact on the decisions of almost 40% of nurses and just over 17% of vets.
The BVU says the sector has become more profit-driven since non-vets were allowed to take over practices in 1999."
The unnecessary prophylactic dispensing of wormers and flea treatments for the profit of these companies (and at the cost of significant harm of wildlife) is a facet of this exploitation of pet owners and their animals. See e.g.
https://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/243875/toxic-flea-tick-treatments-polluting-uk/