Thank you @U_Stormcrow.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Of course. Happy to show my sources, as always.Thank you @U_Stormcrow.
And unlike many States, TN DOES have a provision for paying people whose animals are destroyed. IF your legislature chooses to find it, and NOT for full value.
The commissioner through rules and regulations may establish procedures for the payment of indemnities for animals destroyed under authority of this chapter. Indemnity under this section is not intended to be a full reimbursement but a partial compensation based on, but not limited to, the value of the animal and the availability of funds for that purpose. Indemnification may be disallowed in cases where the owner is in violation of this chapter.
T.C.A. § 44-2-105
Acts 1993, ch. 109, § 1; T.C.A. § 44-2-1305.
Thank you for such a thorough clarification! I figured there must be some truth scattered throughout that comment but it didn't quite make sense to me how the NPIP program could be so widespread if there were so many blatant drawbacks to becoming certified.
There is one last thing that wasn't entirely clear to me - does the NPIP requirement for outside breeders extend to purchasing hatching eggs, or does it only apply when obtaining live fowl?
Love this, btw. It's a great way to think about offered facts whose implications aren't matched broadly by behaviors. Wish more used such challenges to test their thinking on a subject.I figured there must be some truth scattered throughout that comment but it didn't quite make sense to me how the NPIP program could be so widespread if there were so many blatant drawbacks to becoming certified.
Thank you for people like you. I will never be NPIP.I have and will sell and will never be npip. I don't know about what you tagged except that your whole flock will be euthanized is there's a problem and it only good for a year. Also what about buying from a npip? As in the test was only good when it was conducted, what about every day thereafter? Someone could in theory be fine one day get a pass and literally the next day come down with something. I think ita all a crock.
Some people are dedicated advocates and should never be trusted no matter how experienced or educated they try to sound. NPIP will kill your flock if you take sales away from any of any of their mapped regions.First, I should qualify that I'm not a lawyer, and this isn't intended to be legal advice. I've spent years in the legal field, it influences how I sound, and I'm familiar with a number of broad legal concepts.
Having said that, if you read here, you will see that the NPIP program includes not just birds but also hatching eggs. See also. (I can link the federal register as well, but its BORING and not well orgainzed). I conclude, therefore, that obtaining hatching eggs from non-NPIP sources would also be violation of your NPIP agreement. Given a few moment's thought, that makes sense as well (unlike many Gov't mandates) because Salmonella Pullorum can be vertically transmitted (that is, transmitted from Mother to egg), and eliminating Pullorum and Typhoid from the flocks is the goal of the program.
Some people are dedicated advocates and should never be trusted no matter how experienced or educated they try to sound. NPIP will kill your flock if you take sales away from any of any of their mapped regions.
Yes, it is. In anyone's direction, really. I've seen statements as to why one chose NPIP, but I have not seen anyone advocate for it.That's quite the slur to throw in my direction.