- Thread starter
- #31
Thanks!This boy looks better compared to the other 2.
May I ask what you're looking at as well as the tight feathers?
And how are birds #1 and #3 looking quality wise?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks!This boy looks better compared to the other 2.
#2. Legs are good length, back is slightly longer, wings don't hang as low, good head shape, & his tail shape, & angle are decent.Thanks!
May I ask what you're looking at as well as the tight feathers?
And how are birds #1 and #3 looking quality wise?
Thanks!#2. Legs are good length, back is slightly longer, wings don't hang as low, good head shape, & his tail shape, & angle are decent.
#1, & #3. Wings hang too low, legs are abit short, backs are pretty short, tails aren't shaped as great, & the head shapes are fine.
You're welcome.Thanks!
I appreciate you telling me those things.
Now I have thing to work on, and breed in/out.
Yeah, the plumage they describe is hard/tight feathering like I mentioned, but they used more words then needed to say feather type.I found a website saying what the SOP is for OEGB https://www.oldenglishgamebantamclubnc.com/breed-standard
By the way, thank you @Egg Snatcher for the link!I found a website saying what the SOP is for OEGB https://www.oldenglishgamebantamclubnc.com/breed-standard
no problemBy the way, thank you @Egg Snatcher for the link!
That helped clear up a few things for me. Appreciate it!