The interplay of structure, function and feeding regime in a chicken's digestive tract is not well understood, and this article aims to start filling that gap. It is well supported with references and links to authoritative sources of further information and experimental results.
Given the emphasis on the possible impact of adding water to feed, it would have been useful to include in the discussion the normal hydration of feed while in the crop. ("Results indicate that the contents of the crop are gradually moistened; reaching 50% moisture within approximately 60 min" cited article
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056617119303939 with reference 4 there, where it is stated that "feed material in the crop was rather rapidly moistened to>40% moisture"). Birds that eat dry feed drink a lot more water than do birds that eat wet feed, and so the figures for grams of feed consumed should be accompanied by figures for grams of water consumed and those results compared with giving wet feed. Also, the term 'dilution' - common in the literature and liberally scattered across the pages of BYC, so easily repeated without a second thought - begs the question. 'Supplementation' is a more neutral term.
Closer proof reading or copy editing would have caught the remaining typos etc.
All in all, a thought-provoking article on an important topic.