U_Stormcrow
Crossing the Road
A couple thoughts.
One, you can't compete with a Cx. Its why they dominate the market. Neither can you compete with the big producers - when our costs were jumping to $0.40-$0.60/lb for feed during the pandemic, commercial producers were issuing 10q statements complaining of feed costs at $0.19-0.21/lb.
Yes, free range birds offset costs by ranging - how effectively is determined by season, space, breed (somewhat), and the quality of the grounds on which they free range. I save anywhere from 15-35% of expected feed costs, depending on season, for my birds. I continue to work to improve my grounds, just as I continue to work to improve my birds. That savings is offset by however. Free range birds, of whatever variety, are slower to put on weight genetically, meaning they take lionger to get to target weight. All that exercise free ranging develops flavor, but also reduces feed conversion rates. That exercise also makes the meat tougher (as does greater age at target weight).
The Cx is HIGHLY specialized, and highly dependent on specific feed regimen to optimize growth. Production reds are HIGHLY specialized, and give up a lot of average health and longevity to support that rate of lay. Free ranging, self sustaining mutts, "heritage" breeds, and the like are basically four door sedans. They'll never haul your RV or boat, and they won't rocket off the line and corner like a finely tuned sportscar.
Its a matter of tradeoffs. With modern feeds, you can get very good rates of lay, and decent meat production with a number of large breed, fast growth birds - the various [color] rangers are great example of recent efforts to reproduce a larger, fast growing bird that can benefit from free ranging. I'd be inclined to look in that direction first.
Keep in mind also that many "Heritage" breeds (as in breeds that have been around 100, 150 years) have been bred with emphasis on egg production for the last 60, 80 years or more, and have lost a bit of consistent size - I have Brahma, and while they looked huge compared to some golden comets I had of the same age, their weights were only a few ounces heavier. By the time my free ranging Brahma were full size, they were good only for stock or sausage. Brahma, of course, are a large breed, SLOW growth bird. Saving 30% in feed costs isn't a real benefit when it takes 3x as much time to hit target weight.
Better to pick an age when the meat has the right combination of flavor and chew for your preference, and butcher then - even if your yield is 3# instead of 3.5# per bird.
One, you can't compete with a Cx. Its why they dominate the market. Neither can you compete with the big producers - when our costs were jumping to $0.40-$0.60/lb for feed during the pandemic, commercial producers were issuing 10q statements complaining of feed costs at $0.19-0.21/lb.
Yes, free range birds offset costs by ranging - how effectively is determined by season, space, breed (somewhat), and the quality of the grounds on which they free range. I save anywhere from 15-35% of expected feed costs, depending on season, for my birds. I continue to work to improve my grounds, just as I continue to work to improve my birds. That savings is offset by however. Free range birds, of whatever variety, are slower to put on weight genetically, meaning they take lionger to get to target weight. All that exercise free ranging develops flavor, but also reduces feed conversion rates. That exercise also makes the meat tougher (as does greater age at target weight).
The Cx is HIGHLY specialized, and highly dependent on specific feed regimen to optimize growth. Production reds are HIGHLY specialized, and give up a lot of average health and longevity to support that rate of lay. Free ranging, self sustaining mutts, "heritage" breeds, and the like are basically four door sedans. They'll never haul your RV or boat, and they won't rocket off the line and corner like a finely tuned sportscar.
Its a matter of tradeoffs. With modern feeds, you can get very good rates of lay, and decent meat production with a number of large breed, fast growth birds - the various [color] rangers are great example of recent efforts to reproduce a larger, fast growing bird that can benefit from free ranging. I'd be inclined to look in that direction first.
Keep in mind also that many "Heritage" breeds (as in breeds that have been around 100, 150 years) have been bred with emphasis on egg production for the last 60, 80 years or more, and have lost a bit of consistent size - I have Brahma, and while they looked huge compared to some golden comets I had of the same age, their weights were only a few ounces heavier. By the time my free ranging Brahma were full size, they were good only for stock or sausage. Brahma, of course, are a large breed, SLOW growth bird. Saving 30% in feed costs isn't a real benefit when it takes 3x as much time to hit target weight.
Better to pick an age when the meat has the right combination of flavor and chew for your preference, and butcher then - even if your yield is 3# instead of 3.5# per bird.
Last edited: