Hypothetical:
If someone contracts Salmonella, there's a good chance that it came from one of their chickens. Most likely from their poop since if they had it in their system showing symptoms it would be obvious and be treated. I assume if it is carried only in their poop it doesn't effect them? Like we can have E-coli in our feces but get sick only if we ingest it?
So, if Chickens were given antibiotics that are effective against Salmonella, would that then eliminate it from their poop also and eliminate the possibility of people getting it.
I know about good sanitation and washing hands etc, etc so please don't address that part of it.
Please dispute anything that I wrote, it's just what I believe to be true (until you tell me differently), not fact.
If someone contracts Salmonella, there's a good chance that it came from one of their chickens. Most likely from their poop since if they had it in their system showing symptoms it would be obvious and be treated. I assume if it is carried only in their poop it doesn't effect them? Like we can have E-coli in our feces but get sick only if we ingest it?
So, if Chickens were given antibiotics that are effective against Salmonella, would that then eliminate it from their poop also and eliminate the possibility of people getting it.
I know about good sanitation and washing hands etc, etc so please don't address that part of it.
Please dispute anything that I wrote, it's just what I believe to be true (until you tell me differently), not fact.