I'm not disagreeing with you on any point, (you have seen my posts?) except for that your statement infers that this particular one fella is Head Hauncho of Layer Formula, the original Brain behind Inadequate Feed.How does it not have anything to do with current layer feeds? Early farmers were trying to do the same thing that scientists in the mid 1900’s were then able to narrow down to a science. All modern science is and was built on ideas that started with individuals who noticed a problem. The article is one of the first recorded examples of people trying to maximize their profits by adjusting the feed of their laying hens. When you say “maximize profits by feeding the lowest value feed a bird could still live and lay on” that’s exactly what farmers like the one in the article were attempting to do. Maximize their profits by keeping the chickens alive and laying as much as possible. Is it the exact formulas that are in use today? No of course not, but farmers like the one in the article were just the beginning of what would become today’s poultry and feed industry. The question is then why would we want to feed something that was designed and formulated to provide the bare minimum for our chickens health so profits could be maximized?
It was not "this particular guy" or any particular guy, so saying "it's because of this particular man, for this particular reason" is both false and unfair to him.
As you said and we both know, it's decades of people fine tuning methods for budget, production and profit.
It's not the theory that I disagree with but the presentation of information, particularly casting all blame on one individual.
I'm sorry, I should have been more specific when I asked for the source for what point I was having trouble with.