I personally think luck has a lot to do with it when using such a small sample size.
My dad swears by the accuracy of dangling a pin above the egg and observing the way it spins to determine sex. He has seen results to prove it.
My boss had his 10 pullets selected by the hold them upside down and tell the sex depending on how much they flap method. He got all girls.
Common sense tells me both methods are too ridiculous to be true but yet the statistics in their small sample size say it's accurate. I would say the egg shape is the same and has more to do with how hard the chook pushed than what's inside , somebody has to have the odds to win the lottery and this time it was you when the numbers matched your hypothesis. Could you get the same result with 1000 birds? I'm not convinced lol
My dad swears by the accuracy of dangling a pin above the egg and observing the way it spins to determine sex. He has seen results to prove it.
My boss had his 10 pullets selected by the hold them upside down and tell the sex depending on how much they flap method. He got all girls.
Common sense tells me both methods are too ridiculous to be true but yet the statistics in their small sample size say it's accurate. I would say the egg shape is the same and has more to do with how hard the chook pushed than what's inside , somebody has to have the odds to win the lottery and this time it was you when the numbers matched your hypothesis. Could you get the same result with 1000 birds? I'm not convinced lol