new research debunks trad views on nutrition

[Perris]

It's not poisonous, it's a possible endocrine interuptor .
Possibly cause cancer years later also. But are most things anymore.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36841402/

PSNP inhibited acetylcholinesterase and altered endocrine-related gene expression profiles both in the thyroid and glucocorticoid axes. At the whole organism level, we observed altered behaviors such as increased activity and anxiety at lower doses and lethargy at a higher dose, which could be due to a variety of complex mechanisms ranging from sensory organ and central nervous system effects to others such as hormonal imbalances. In addition, we present a hypothetical adverse outcome pathway related to these effects. In conclusion, this study provides new understanding into NP toxic effects on zebrafish embryo, emphasizing a critical role of endocrine disruption in observed neurotoxic behavioral effects, and improving our understanding of their potential health risks to human populations.

embryos are not ideal subjects in my view: they're very sensitive to things that wouldn't have any impact on fully formed subjects. So I would just park that concern for now.

 

[Molpet]

They are talking about people needing more complete protein, especially animal proteins.


https://www.theprairiehomestead.com...piece-mastering-nutrition-for-the-homesteader

 

[Perris]

They are talking about people needing more complete protein, especially animal proteins.


https://www.theprairiehomestead.com...piece-mastering-nutrition-for-the-homesteader

thanks for this; personally I prefer to read than listen to a podcast, but many people here would probably prefer this podcast over a book on nutritional geometry, and the message is the same, so it's all good.

Note the emphasis on the protein target being dominant, and the point that we usually get most if not all of our necessary vitamins and minerals with that (if we are eating proper real food, and not getting it by popping concentrates or supplement pills), and then the carbs will take care of themselves.

 

[Molpet]

personally I prefer to read than listen to a podcast,

Me too. I can read faster than they speak, skip the non information and re-read the important part.

 

[RoyalChick]

Me too. I can read faster than they speak, skip the non information and re-read the important part.

Yes. This.
Sorry to go off topic but this is the first time I have found someone else who feels this way.
Today’s obsession with video to convey factual information drives me nuts for the same reason.
Back to nutrition.

 

[Sally PB]

^^Ditto!

 

[Perris]

Sorry to go off topic but this is the first time I have found someone else who feels this way.

No apologies necessary! There was me thinking it was just me, and feeling like an old fogey on the topic of modern media... and now it appears that a preference for the written word is common amongst those on this thread!

 

[Shadrach]

I'll join. Some podcasts are okay.

 

[NanaK]

I prefer to read than listen to a podcast

Same for me.
I remember more from written word than listening to a podcast.
I have a friend that listens to books. I'd rather read the book.

 

[saysfaa]

Me too. All the same reasons - I read much faster than they speak, retain more, reread as needed much more easily (immediately and going back a long ways or checking appendices), ..

And prefer to not be influenced by the tone and emphasis the reader might put on the information.

I have come to really enjoy audiobooks and some types of podcasts, though.

Almost never the video versions unless it is about how to do something - then sometimes.