Should i be worried about not laying at 20 weeks?

I have easter eggers (including lakeside eggers which are basically easter eggers) and a buff orpington. They are about 22 weeks old now. 2 started at 19 weeks, 2 started earlier this week at about 21 weeks and the other 3 aren't laying yet, one of which probably won't for a bit. You're doing absolutely nothing wrong, neither easter eggers nor orpingtons tend to be early to start. I would personally keep everyone either on starter or all flock with oyster shell on the side as there's no telling when they'll start laying
 
Should I add oyster shell to the food as well or just on the side??
Never mix oyster shell nor mineral calcium with feed. You don't know what the ending % of calcium in the feed will be. It would force the birds to consume more than necessary or healthy if they want to eat.
It would also alter the purpose of providing it, since you don't currently have layers. Always provide any mineral supplement in a separate container.
 
I think it is important to evaluate if it is in one's best interest for their birds to begin laying eggs at an early stage. I think the benefits of that schedule don't outweigh the risks.
IMHO, the earlier a pullet begins to lay, the better chance there is of becoming egg bound. A 16 week old pullet's body just really isn't ready for the challenge.
The later onset of lay, the larger the first eggs will be.
I've always been content to let eggs come when they do without any effort at speeding the process.
 
I think it is important to evaluate if it is in one's best interest for their birds to begin laying eggs at an early stage. I think the benefits of that schedule don't outweigh the risks.
Don't worry. It is just forum thread fodder. The chickens will lay when they are ready no matter how impatient the owner.
 

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom