- Thread starter
- #2,811
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This K intriques me. He is a 75 bird, but his barring is more a throw back to the 50-50 birds in that he is light colored. What intrigues me is his sheer size. He feathered in very quickly, (good thing) and had size right out of the shell. He dwarfs the other K's of his age. Note that P next to him.
Here he is with his head in the feeder. No surprise.
I know I want to see him grow up and Be-All-That-He-Can-Be. While his sire was a very stout male, (my avatar) this guy is something else. I'm wondering how long it will take for the other K's to catch him. He wins the "most interesting" bird of the 2014 hatch. hmmmmmm….
And what breed are the dark birds in with him?
Those are Rhode Island Reds. My work-in-progress line.
Now a contentious statement, perhaps. A good Rock, of good and true breeding will not have to be GINORMOUS to hit those marks. A Rock should be solid as a rock and surprise the uninitiated by their heft, in relationship to overall size, when picked up for the first time.
It's one of my favorites things to do. To bid a customer to go ahead, pick that cockerel right there off the roost. Then, go ahead and take that pullet next to him. I love the looks on their faces when they handle my birds for the first time.
The standard weights are an indicator of function, but the attribute of importance is the ability to produce eggs and meat efficiently. The problem with the standard weights, given the description of economic qualities that they follow, is precisely that they were written for the Plymouth Rock population (and the culture/economy) of over 100 years ago. There has been substantial progress by the commercial industries since that time in selection for the attributes that are economically important. The genetic parameters of the breed in 1900, including the correlations between such things as body weight and egg production, are no longer the same. Furthermore, grain costs are substantially higher (necessitating better feed efficiency), fewer folks have the skill/patience to prepare older fowl (necessitating earlier growth curves) etc. Times have changed. Romanticism about the past gives warm fuzzy feelings, and I too enjoy and learn from the pictures. But the hard truth is that function is far more important than form, for any breed that wishes to claim economic importance. The Plymouth Rock was developed by practical people, people who if they were alive today and saw that we now have the genetic potential to make birds with feed conversion approaching 2:1, with dressing percentages in excess of 70% AND that grow up to lay 200 eggs/year, would think that we were completely nuts to ignore 100 years of selective progress opting instead to romanticize the past. So what if it meant that our birds weighed more than the weights they found to be optimal in their time? Modern 15 lb broiler breeders, which originated from White Rocks, can and do lay enough eggs to be profitable and run around like bantams, if objectively selected for production and vigor as they have been. Anyone who says that they lack the ability to forage/thrive in backyard scenarios is lacking experience themselves. Want to talk about looks on faces? Have a judge pull a 10 lb Blue Rock hen with 1/4 broiler blood out of her show cage, and then tell him honestly that she laid 150 eggs that year.Your concerns are valid. I do honor the weight of the standard. Others may do as they wish, but 1/2 pound over the standard is the limit or it is too heavy for me. The reasons are loyalty to the standard? Well, yes, but only because that IS the breed. If I want good egg laying, and I do, then I want the bird as it was intended to be. This is why I posted those historical photos, one reason anyway.
A cock should be 9.5 pounds. A hen should be 7.5 pounds. It is urgent, in my view, to hit those marks like a stage dancer on Broadway. I consider a pound under to be too light.
Now a contentious statement, perhaps. A good Rock, of good and true breeding will not have to be GINORMOUS to hit those marks. A Rock should be solid as a rock and surprise the uninitiated by their heft, in relationship to overall size, when picked up for the first time.
It's one of my favorites things to do. To bid a customer to go ahead, pick that cockerel right there off the roost. Then, go ahead and take that pullet next to him. I love the looks on their faces when they handle my birds for the first time.