What breeds could be in this EE?

@Lady of McCamley, just curious.... is the rumpless/non-tailed trait dominant over the tailed gene?

My head is not around all the genetics for rumplessness (say that fast 3 times). It appears mostly a dominant trait, unless the "normal" parent has genes which inhibit its expression and cause tail growth (which most chickens have). Other sources I have read indicated tails required more genetic code with genes for expression of that tail.

From what I can gather, there are 3 types of rumpless (tail-less) types.

Complete dominant (genetic)

Incomplete dominant (genetic)

Accidental (failure of tail growth due to environmental changes affecting the embryo during growth which can happen in any breed)

There also appears to be a recessive (genetic) type hat is more of a mutation that causes further deformities in the bird.

So the short answer is, somewhat dominant to dominant. Therefore, you can get tailed and rumpless offspring....unless the other parent has the genes to repress the rumpless gene and cause tail growth.

Rumpless is not necessarily a good thing for the bird (and therefore less likely to be bred forward in natural settings). Rumpless roos lose the ability to balance during mating causing reduced fertility (roos use their tail to stabilize during mating to assure close enough contact to the female, roos do not have an appendage), rumpless birds also lose a portion of the back bone which can also cause other problems with short backs, and they lose the oil gland located on the tail base. Hatchability of rumpless birds has also been show to be reduced.

Add in the fact that the tufting gene also causes death in 25% of the chicks and you get something of a temperamental bird to breed. Hence why the Araucana is so rare and held by professional breeders rather than mass production hatcheries (as who wants to deal with all that and try to make profits?). The Araucana finickiness eliminated them from my list of breed choices as I developed my olive egger program.

I think I misquoted in my earlier post...the Collona were rumpless, pea combed and blue laying. The Quetro were tailed, tufted and laid a brown egg. The matings of those types produced what was known as the Araucana, a rumpless, pea combed, tufted, blue laying chicken...who could also genetically have tails and no tufts among siblings depending upon the genetic dice.

I'm not sure when the muff/bearding came in. I know that a number of Araucana types were imported from Chile at different times during the development of the Araucana and later Ameraucana, and that the original stock was not pure breeds in Chile, meaning you got a lot more genetics to work through in refining a stock that does breed true.

The Chilean stock came from Asian sources which has been verified genetically, and there are beards, crests, tufts found in Asian birds. The addition of the European fowl with the Spanish in the 1500's further muddied the waters. (You can see how trying to get a "true" Araucana out of Chile would have been difficult.)

Oh...and R.C. Punnet was not breeding for blue layers specifically, he was breeding for auto-sexing and tossed in blue Araucana blood for the fun of it as they were all the "rage" at the time. I summed that info too quickly in my earlier post. (Just want to be accurate).

LofMc

http://www.browneggblueegg.com/Article/Rumplessness.html
http://www.araucana.com/Rumplessness.htm
 
Last edited:
I have a flock of 8 Rhode Island Reds and three Auracana's. Two of my EE have the tufts of feathers right at the back of their beak. They look like Auracana's. My other one doesn't have that and she is white and black. Just wondered if the white one got threw in from pen of breeds. Any comments from anyone?
 

Attachments

  • 20170524_153214.jpg
    20170524_153214.jpg
    613.5 KB · Views: 3
  • 20170524_153439.jpg
    20170524_153439.jpg
    404.3 KB · Views: 3
  • 20170524_153445.jpg
    20170524_153445.jpg
    353.4 KB · Views: 3
I have a flock of 8 Rhode Island Reds and three Auracana's. Two of my EE have the tufts of feathers right at the back of their beak. They look like Auracana's. My other one doesn't have that and she is white and black. Just wondered if the white one got threw in from pen of breeds. Any comments from anyone?


Hi, Welcome to BYC.

You have Easter Eggers (a hybrid or mix) derived from Ameraucanas not Araucanas.
They have the tell tale willow (green) legs and beards and tails, traits from Ameraucana. Ear tufts are on the side of the head by the earlobes rather than at the side of the beak. US Araucana are yellow legged, tufted or not (as tufting is lethal for 25%), and rumpless...none of which traits are reflected in your birds (and rumpless is generally dominant for EE mixes with Araucanas.)

I can't see the white bird well enough to tell you much, but none of them are Araucana....at least not US standard.

The white bird may not be EE. Place a good profile photo and close up head shot on a new Breed or Gender question thread for input.

LofMc
 
I bought my Auracanas at Waldens Feed and supply. Not sure what hatchery they use. I did ask for Americana and they told me they were auracana. I'll try to get a better picture of the white one. Thanks
 
I bought my Auracanas at Waldens Feed and supply. Not sure what hatchery they use. I did ask for Americana and they told me they were auracana. I'll try to get a better picture of the white one. Thanks


Feed stores only sell EE's. Breeders sell Araucanas or Ameraucanas. There is no such thing as an Americana.

Your other birds look to be EE's, but the white bird has a different appearance, so I suspicion something else but can't tell for sure without better photo.
LofMc
 

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom