I am not sure this is true. We just took hunters safety this past fall and one of the things they taught was considering when you take a shot at an animal that it is well within your designated hunting area. Trespassing is trespassing is trespassing. Unless you have oral or written permission from the property owner you are not allowed to trespass, even if you have wounded an animal and it is suffering. Honestly, if you have to chase a wounded dog down with a truck it is probably not fatally wounded at that point.
Shooting a dog that is not on your property is a felony in the state of Kansas. It is prosecuting that is going to be the pickle in this situation.
Danz- I talked to DH and of course there are not very good options. In Maine where I grew up animal control (which is part of the police department) is in charge of cases like this and they would investigate with back up from local or state authorities depending on the seriousness of the charge. The state animal control officer would be called in and animal cruelty charges would be pressed if it could be proven that the dog was not on his property when it was killed (which it doesn't sound like it was unless he drove the dog off?!)
Anyway, DH recommended having a necropsy done on Cloud so you could have a report of what kind of weapon was used and proof of cause of death. If you can get her body to K State they will do it for free. He also said you should contact the sheriff and your county prosecutor with information about the case and the link between animal cruelty and other dangerous behavior that people can get into. There are lots of good articles about the connection between killing an animal and eventually harming another person. It isn't much but it might be worth a try.
If this were a case where the property owner shot and killed a dog that in their mind was harassing their livestock then I could see that but this is disturbing to me to know you have a neighbor (or someone) who thinks it is ok to chase a dog down in their truck (on a neighbors property!) and shoot it. I would be concerned about the poor judgement this individual made and that is why I would push to do all you can.
Such a total waste of a good dog.
Shooting a dog that is not on your property is a felony in the state of Kansas. It is prosecuting that is going to be the pickle in this situation.
Unfortunately, I believe in the State of Kansas, a person has the right to walk onto someone else's land to put an animal they have shot out of it's misery. (which is what the second shot definitely sounds like. )
In Kansas, a dog trespassing on to your property and even the hint of danger to livestock is enough to shoot it. (and I am sure the goats are not used to the dog, so they ran from it... that would be enough to hint that the dog might be after them. (even though you know your dog wouldn't do it, he doesn't.))
Unfortunately, there isn't a lot of places to turn to unless you can find proof that this all occurred on your neighbor's property, and not just ended there.
You need to see if there is a blood trail? (either ask a GOOD hunter friend (who actually knows how to track, not just someone who shoots), or call your local fish and game office and see if they would be able to help you.) You are going to need to establish whether your dog was off the property and they just came on the property to place the second shot, or if the dog never was off the property.
YOU cant really press charges for much of anything... Dogs are considered property and no matter what their job description was they are still not allowed to wander off property.
HOWEVER, If your neighbor is a good friend and will help you out by stating on record your dog was allowed on the property, you then might be able to get who ever did it for destruction of property, and she could get them for trespassing.
Unfortunately, there isn't a lot of places to turn to unless you can find proof that this all occurred on your neighbor's property, and not just ended there.
Danz- I talked to DH and of course there are not very good options. In Maine where I grew up animal control (which is part of the police department) is in charge of cases like this and they would investigate with back up from local or state authorities depending on the seriousness of the charge. The state animal control officer would be called in and animal cruelty charges would be pressed if it could be proven that the dog was not on his property when it was killed (which it doesn't sound like it was unless he drove the dog off?!)
Anyway, DH recommended having a necropsy done on Cloud so you could have a report of what kind of weapon was used and proof of cause of death. If you can get her body to K State they will do it for free. He also said you should contact the sheriff and your county prosecutor with information about the case and the link between animal cruelty and other dangerous behavior that people can get into. There are lots of good articles about the connection between killing an animal and eventually harming another person. It isn't much but it might be worth a try.
If this were a case where the property owner shot and killed a dog that in their mind was harassing their livestock then I could see that but this is disturbing to me to know you have a neighbor (or someone) who thinks it is ok to chase a dog down in their truck (on a neighbors property!) and shoot it. I would be concerned about the poor judgement this individual made and that is why I would push to do all you can.
Such a total waste of a good dog.