- Thread starter
- #141
Made up composite breeds:
American Games (crosses of OEG, Asian, and Spanish game breeds)
Asil or Aseel (In the west, they are the resutt of the crossing of distinct separate lineages found in India, Pakistan, and surrounding countries.)
Breeds, as we know them, are an invention of the late 18th Century; before that animals were bred to be of a type, not breed. There were meat and dairy cattle, although generally the milch cow outside of Northern Europe came from the draft or meat stock- and any steer could be used as an ox for riding or draft purposes.. Dogs were bred to be "hound type", "lurcher type" or some other type. Many of the types were landrace stock. The only chickens that were selectively bred at the time seem to be game fowl.
Registries for animals began with a stud book in Britain as a result of a demand for a better class of cavalry horse, a matter that had not worried the sea power British much before the 17th C. James I imported an Arabian stallion, and this caught the attention of breeders - but the first effort at the General Stud Book was in 1791. Early on, it was restricted to the offspring of Arabian stallions on native mares, or the offspring of Arabian stallions on mares who were the result of an Arabian - native mare cross. In the early days there was great emphasis on making sure that the animals were not consanguineous. The original animals were entirely practical, and were tested in races of as long as eight miles to be sure they would meet the requirements of the cavalry. In the late 18th C. there came a demand for "sprint races", which seems to have encompassed any run below about two miles in length. Around that time, the registry or stud book was opened to crosses between the original half-blood horses. Prior to that they had no established type, and were registered solely on the criteria of lineage. (There is a modern tendency to see the original crosses superiority as entirely due to the alleged superiority of the Arabian horse by those who have forgotten that the native dams were also extremely fine animals and made an equal contribution to a cross that excelled both parents in the desired qualities.)
Chickens were predominately barnyard scavengers in Europe. The eggs were collected and when they were eaten in Britain, it was as an expensive delicacy. British farmers who raised meat birds did not attempt to improve them, and meat birds were not raised for home consumption. Looking through history, it seems that the breeding of practical, specialized fowl was perhaps first and last a project of the Romans who discovered chickens made excellent portable rations for the troops. The only selective breeding of poultry in Britain seems to have been restricted to game fowl.
Colonial North America was an entirely different environment. The chicken was kept as a practical, subsistence food source. Even the local tribes took up the raising of chickens; the Iroquois are documented as raising chickens by 1687, and chickens were in British North America no later than 1609; while the Spanish introduced them during the conquest.
The Colonial British ate chicken and eggs in the summer, overwintered a few to provide for next years breeding, and ate eggs and chicken in the summer. They were a food source that rustled up most of its own food, and could eat whatever portion of the leftovers - AKA slops - that weren't fed to any hogs that happened to be on hand.
Selective breeding wasn't really practiced until the North Americans (here defined as Canadians and Americans) began to try and improve birds in the mid-19th Century, apparently inspired by the "hen fever" fad.
In the US and Canada there was a fervor associated with Cochins and Brahmas, just as in Europe; but rural Americans seemed to find the practical application of Javas, Cochins, and Brahmas to be of interest. The result of these early American selective breeding efforts later resulted in the export of America breeds to Europe where they played an important role in the development of many European breeds, including the Orpington, Welsumer (via the Orpington), the Niederrhein, the Dutch North Holland fowl (not to be confused with the American Holland fowl), the Amrock (a European/British utility breed of Plymouth Rock ancestry, but bred for performance), Langshan (a bare legged German breed as distinguished from the British feather legged Croad Langshan), the Vorwerk (by way of the Orpingtons), Marans, and Ixworth.
From what I understand from what has been said, American Game would be a type and not a breed. It was stated earlier that the only thing in common is body type.
"The Colonial British ate chicken and eggs in the summer, overwintered a few to provide for next years breeding, and ate eggs and chicken in the summer."
Is that correct? What did you mean to write?