This is a tangent, but we had a demo the other day. An AI that would write a course rubric out of Course Outcome statements. The learning expert involved in the project said the uni doesn't have the connection between Course Outcomes and assessment rubrics. I said, yes it does, it's in the humans. Anyway, the AI was of course a dunderhead and made mostly preposterous suggestions. By the time it was prompted over and over to get to something plausible, any expert could've documented it themselves. All very inefficient. I just hope the experience will prompt the learning expert to reflect upon the differences between creative expertise and procedural repetition. Oh, I just remembered, his other main reason for pursuing this 'innovation' was that a different university was already working on such a thing - he was so worried about market pressure that he was wasting effort on something nonsensical.snap!
like marking on paper (trivial) versus electronically (a real pita)